Lip cancer is a common malignancy accounting for approximately 30% of oral cavity malignant tumors.
8) The most frequent malignancy related to the lips is squamous cell carcinoma and 90% of cases involved in the lower lip.
1) Oncologic wide excision with safety margins plays an important role in lip malignancy treatment and large defects are often encountered.
9) Several reconstructive techniques have been described depending on the defect’s size and location. For small defects affecting less than one-third of the lip, it can be treated by primary closure or advancement flap.
10) Larger defects require local or distant flaps use. There are various techniques for reconstruction including Karapandzic flap, Abbe flap, Estlander flap, Bernard-Burrow flap, Gilles fan flap or combinations.
9,
11) In 1974, Karapandzic introduced the technique to repair large lip defects using neurovascular myocutaneous flaps based on the superior and inferior arteries. This technique is a Gillies fan flap modification, which often results in oral incompetence due to lip denervation.
4) In this modification, the key lip neurovascular bundles are kept intact, thus preserving lip sensation, motor function and optimizing tissue vascularity.
12) This is a sensate axial musculomucocutaneous flap and is useful for closing one-half to two-thirds upper lip defects or up to three-quarters lower lip defects.
6) In the preoperative design, it is helpful to mark the patient’s nasolabial, labiomandibular, and mental creases. These creases are easily seen in older patients, but is sometimes not obvious in younger patients. In such cases, patients should be asked to smile to exhibit the creases. Semicircular incision lines should be drawn from the defect toward the nasolabial creases bilaterally. The skin incisions are made along the designed line followed by careful dissection to identify the labial arteries and nerve branches. The orbicuralis oris muscle is identified and separated carefully from adjacent tissues while preserving the lip elevator and depressor muscles, such as the levator labii superioris, levator anguli oris, and depressor anguli oris. However, these muscles could be released to achieve sufficient flap mobility in larger defects. The other major advantages of the Karapandzic flap are that it is a single-stage surgical procedure and its quick execution once learned.
5) As every surgery technique has its pros and cons, the Karapandzic technique’s major drawback is that the lip circumference is reduced, can cause microstomia, and loss of the commissures.
4,
6) Microstomia results in not only adverse cosmetic problems, but also functional impairments, such as pronunciation, difficulty with food intake, and poor oral hygiene.
13) In approximately 24% of patients who underwent the Karapandzic flap for lip reconstruction, secondary commissuroplasty procedures were required to correct microstomia.
4) Commissuroplasty methods are abundant and range from simple advancement flap to complex reconstruction using free flap. In our case, buccal mucosal advancement flap technique, which is the simplest method for commissuroplasty, was used. The procedure produced an acceptable aesthetic and functional result. In summary, the Karapandzic flap is one of the useful techniques for large lip defect reconstruction. This technique is a single-stage procedure and allows important neurovascular bundle preservation, thus resulting in lip sensory and motor function preservation. The major disadvantage of this technique is microstomia, but this can be easily corrected with secondary commissuroplasty. For large lip defect corrections, the Karapandzic flap is a good option with satisfactory functional and aesthetic results. However, there are some limitations concering lip functions, such as oral competence, speech, and social expression. Further study is needed for a complex set of motions between the circular contraction of the orbicularis oris and the radial action of the lip elevators and depressors.