The lips differ from other body parts as they perform various functions such as articulation, food intake, and facial expression.
6) Consequently, their complex nature makes them crucial from both functional and aesthetic perspectives. The skin of the lips exhibits a layered structure; it begins as dry skin on the outer portion, transitions to a moist red hue towards the oral entrance, and becomes a mucous membrane inside the oral cavity.
6-
8) Lips receive their blood supply from the peripheral arteries emanating from the facial artery. The lower lip possesses a relatively simple aesthetic structure compared to the upper lip. It maintains a uniform contour, is more resilient, and typically has a greater tissue volume, making it feasible for use in reconstructing the upper lip.
8) Any lip defects should account for the Cupid’s bow, philtral ridges, and alar margins. Both lips maintain adequate oral function through the muscles surrounding the commissures. Various reconstruction methods, from primary closure to the Abbe-Estlander flap and skin grafting, are considered based on defect size and location.
8,
9) Specifically, total lower lip reconstruction is a challenging procedure, achievable either via microsurgical free tissue transfer or multi-staged local flap repair. Both techniques have their merits and challenges, demanding specialized expertise.
10) In this case report, we discuss a rare case involving the removal and reconstruction of an extensive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) occupying more than two-thirds of the lip. A safety margin was included in the resection to prevent recurrence, making the actual resection significantly larger than the carcinoma itself. This necessitated the complete removal of the lower lip. In the operating room, a frozen biopsy confirmed the negative margin. Reconstruction was then performed using bilateral Karapandzic neurovascular rotation flaps. The Karapandzic flap is primarily used for large lip defects, particularly for the lower lip. This technique simultaneously transfers adjacent skin and muscles. It preserves sensation and motor function around the mouth, boasts a relatively higher flap survival rate, and ensures a harmonious aesthetic outcome in terms of skin color, texture, and thickness. While the option of a free flap was considered, given the patient’s smoking history, underlying conditions, vascular health, and desired aesthetic outcomes, the Karapandzic flap was deemed the optimal choice for reconstruction. A drawback of the Karapandzic flap is potential post-operative microstomia, which can complicate food intake. Additionally, it may introduce tension to the surrounding skin, heightening the risk of secondary com- plications. However, the functional, aesthetic, and social benefits outweigh these challenges. In conclusion, lip reconstruction following cancer requires a tailored approach, considering the patient’s overall health, cancer location and size, and patient expectations. Collaborative decision-making, involving plastic surgeons and head-neck specialists, is essential in selecting the most appropriate reconstructive method.